Most automation tools ask what your systems expose. That question rules out the half of your stack that exposes nothing at all.
Every integration-first tool starts from the same question: what does this system expose? It is a reasonable question, and it quietly rules out the supplier portal with no API, the internal admin page nobody owns any more, and the vendor dashboard whose export button produces a PDF.
That is not the exotic tail of a stack. For most teams it is the middle of it. The work that eats the week happens in exactly the tools that never got an integration, because the tools that did get one were the ones worth integrating.
Work the page, not the API
Rowbot runs where the work already happens: inside the browser session your team is already signed into. It reads the page, decides the next step, and acts on it — the same sequence a person performs, at the same permissions that person has.
There is nothing to provision, because there is no new access path. If someone can do the job in their browser, their agent can do it in their browser. If they cannot, neither can it.
What this buys you
The obvious win is coverage: any site is fair game, so the automation you want is not gated on a vendor's roadmap. The subtler win is scope. Access is per person, on an allow-list, and it inherits the boundaries your identity provider already enforces — rather than a service account with a key that quietly outlives whoever created it.
The cost is honest too: work scheduled in the browser needs a browser open. Most teams schedule it inside a window they are online anyway, and take the trade.
← All posts